Welcome to ADAabuse.com!

Home Page

Cohan, James

Frankovich

Garcia, Alfredo

Hubbard

Landers

Lakota

Mehrban

Molski

Potter

Pinnock / Wakefield

Pinnock Injury Claims

Pinnock lawsuits

P&W False Claims

Class Actions?

Sims, H.J.

Singleton

Issues

Injury Claims

Not paying tax?

Contact Us

 

Landers Law Offices

 


Breaking news:

CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION

. . . in connection with the filing of over 500 ADA accessibility lawsuits

[see KFMB News 8 Special Report, parts 4 and 5, below]

See also the earlier features in this investigation, below; especially Part 2, below, about one professional plaintiff who reportedly  became disabled committing armed robbery;

See video deposition footage of another similar case (different plaintiff, same attorney), further down this page . . .


Media
The latest: Part 7 (3 mins)
Media
Part 1 (5 mins)
Media
Part 2 (5 mins)
Media
Part 3 (2 mins)
Media
Part 4 (3.4 mins)
Media
Part 5 (2.2 mins)
Media
Part 6 (1.7 mins)

"Do as I say-- not as I do"  See photos below of the offices of this attorney, who has filed 600+ ADA/accessibility lawsuits against others.  Note many of the same violations he's alleged injured his clients at others' locations; including:

  • Paper towel dispenser over 40" from floor
  • Soap dispenser beyond acceptable reach range
  • No grab bars in stalls
  • Seat paper dispenser above acceptable range
  • Mirror too high
  • Urinal too high
  • Pipes under sink not wrapped
  • Inadequate maneuvering room for wheelchair (partition could easily be removed)
  • Various irregularities in parking area

Don't believe us?  You can see this property for yourself at 7840 Mission Center Court, San Diego, CA 92108.  If you have disabilities and have had difficulty accessing this attorney's offices, please Contact Us.  To see more pictures of this attorney's offices and other shocking information, please Click Here.  These photos were taken in June 2004 and 2005; the situations represented are believed to have existed for many years, and certainly through much, if not all, of the time this attorney has filed over 600 ADA/accessibility lawsuits against other properties-- many of them over the exact same accessibility issues which existed at his own office.


No ramp to main entrance, no directional signs to accessible entrance
Disabled parking sign too low, not van accessible, paint barely recognizable, ramp in improper access aisle
No ISA symbol on door, no kickplate, no directional sign to accessible entrance
No grab bars, seat paper dispenser too high, inadequate maneuvering area (easily fixed by removing partition
Pipes under sink unwrapped; could expose user to scalding
Urinal too high
Paper towel dispenser too high and away from reach range
Mirror too high, soap dispenser out of reach range
No access past curb
No curb cuts, no directional sign to accessible entry
No curb cuts or directional sign to accessible entry
No directional signs to accessible entry
No ISA symbol on doors, no kickplates, no ramp
Disabled parking sign too low, almost unreadable ISA symbol, inadequate access aisle, ramp in access aisle, no ISA symbol at door

Significant filings in various Landers cases

(the most current information in most of these cases

can be found at: http://pacer.uspci.uscourts.gov/)


Document
$20k sanction issued against Attorney Landers for vexatious / unreasonable multiplication of legal proceedings!
   
Document
Award of attorneys' fees and referral to State Bar
Document
Vexatious Litigant Order re: G. Carlock
Document
Dismissal Granted re Mootness
Document
OSC re questionable signatures
Document
Defendants reqest for refund of settlement payment
Document
Vexatious litigant motion
Document
Evidence suggesting pltfs did not visit locations claimed
Document
Evidence Pltf would prefer less $ than to provide identity documents
Document
OSC re dismiss ADA case as moot
Document
Lawsuit against former employee
Document
Sued his own church (first of two lawsuits)
Document
Sued his own church (second of two lawsuits)
Document
566+ access lawsuits
Document
353 lawsuits in 365 days
Document
83 lawsuits in 90 days
Significant signature variations observed in various legal documents:

Pltf. Carlock


Document
Assorted Carlock Signatures
Atty. Landers
Document
Assorted Landers Signatures
Pltf. Rivera
Document
Several Rivera Signatures
If you have copies of any documents signed by any plaintiff represented by the Landers Law Offices, please fax them toll-free to (888) 453-1262.  Thank you.

Law Firm:  RL

Lawyer: R. Landers

Plaintiff: F. Ambaosio (Ambrosio)

PI claimed in paragraph 39 of each complaint; note "and continues to suffer" PI:


Ambaosio v AmayaAmbaosio v Aqua AdventuresAmbaosio v Aqua Motel
Ambaosio v Big-O-TiresAmbaosio v BollweevilAmbaosio Budget Trade and Gas
Ambaosio v Carls JrAmbaosio v Centre City CafeAmbaosio v Colonial Inn
Ambaosio v DennysAmbaosio v Economy InnAmbaosio v El Capitan Motor Inn
Ambaosio v El Pollo Loco (case 255)Ambaosio v El Pollo Loco (case 299)Ambaosio v Golden West Lodge
Ambaosio v Hatzidakis Coast BurgersAmbaosio v Hermanos LopezAmbaosio v IHOP (case 803)
Ambaosio v IHOP (case 3906)Ambaosio v JoJos' Cocos Family RestaurantAmbaosio v Juan Pollo Chicken
Ambaosio v La MirageAmbaosio v LB FuelAmbaosio v McDonald's (case 2240)
Ambaosio v McDonald's (case 1607)Ambaosio v McDonald's (case 627)Ambaosio v Pizza Hut Inc.
Ambaosio v Popeye's Chicken & BiscuitsAmbaosio v Rocky Inn MotelAmbaosio v Royal Grand Inn
Ambaosio v San Diego First BankAmbaosio v Spring EnterprisesAmbaosio v State Motel
Ambaosio v Tacos Mexico Ambaosio v Taco JoesAmbaosio v Travel Inn
Ambaosio v Travel KingAmbaosio v Upierre Burger KingAmbaosio v Valvoline Instant
Ambaosio v WendysAmbaosio v Wienerschnitzel  

Law Firm:  RL

Lawyer: R. Landers

Plaintiff: G. Carlock

PI claimed in paragraph 39 of each complaint; note "and continues to suffer" PI:


Carlock v Aiberto'sCarlock v Arby'sCarlock v Cafe Lamaze
Carlock v Car QuestCarlock v Center CutCarlock v Dominos
Carlock v FirestoneCarlock v KragenCarlock v La Cima
Carlock v McDonald'sCarlock v McDonald's (2)Carlock v Mobil
Carlock v Parker InvestmentsCarlock v RecyclingCarlock v Rocket
Carlock v RPM FinancialCarlock v Smog SpecialistsCarlock v Stadium
Carlock v Taco BellCarlock v Tropics TavernCarlock v Union 76
Carlock v. Burger KingCarlock v. Anthony CarltonCarlock v. Arby's
Carlock v. BatshonCarlock v. BovetasCarlock v. Burger King 3036
Carlock v. Carl's Jr 12160Carlock v. Churches ChickenCarlock v. Del Taco 12800
Carlock v. Del Taco 3190Carlock v. El Pollo LocoCarlock v. Holiday Inn
Carlock v. Homeland Petro.Carlock v I Hop 3625Carlock v. KFC
Carlock v. M&M GrandCarlock v. Marriott Host.Carlock v. McDonalds
Carlock v. Moriarty Del TacoCarlock v. Napa Auto PartsCarlock v. Notel Motel
Carlock v. Patel Crows Inn.Carlock v. PatelCarlock v. Pomeroy MC.
Carlock v. PopeyesCarlock v. RashidCarlock v. Suncoast Ventures Taco Bell
Carlock v. ToscoCarlock v. Travel Ldg.Carlock v. Wayn's Engine
Carlock v. WienerschnitzelCarlock v. Collins Motors, Inc. Order dismissing case Re Renovations  

Law Firm:  RL

Lawyer: R. Landers

Plaintiff: D. Jones

PI claimed in paragraph 39 of each complaint; note "and continues to suffer" PI:


Jones v Ann's TailoringJones v Arby'sJones v Arco
Jones v Beauty Boutique IncJones v Bonita Golf Club and RestaurantJones v Brake Depot
Jones v Burger KingJones v Carls Jr Restaurant (case 2010)Jones v Carls Jr Restaurant (case 862)
Jones v Carlton Oaks Country ClubJones v Central ParkingJones v Church's Fried Chicken
Jones v Dakota InnJones v Deja Vu ShowGirlsJones v Del Taco
Jones v El Pollo LocoJones v Formosa ClubJones v Holualoa Mission Valley
Jones v Jade Chinese RestaurantJones v Kay UltramarJones v Ledezma's Automotive Center
Jones v Luroberto's RestaurantJones v Long John Silvers RestaurantJones v McDonalds (case 453)
Jones v McDonalds (case 2157)Jones v McDonalds (case 697)Jones v Mt. Woodson Golf Club
Jones v Oil Changers Jones v One Day Paint and Body CentersJones v Rens
Jones v Robertos Taco ShopJones v Royal Vista InnJones v San Diego Bulb Company
Jones v Taco Bell (case 2008)Jones v Taco Bell (case 1263)
Jones v TJ Furniture OutletJones v Tres Estrellas de Oro  

Law Firm:  RL

Lawyer: R. Landers

Plaintiff: I. Rivera

PI claimed in paragraph 39 of each complaint; note "and continues to suffer" PI:


Rivera v Arby'sRivera v Best Western Marty's ValleyRivera v Burger King
Rivera v Carls Jr (case 1801)Rivera v Carls Jr (case 256)Rivera v Del Taco
Rivera v EconoLubeRivera v Exxon MobilFive Hundred (500) Motors Wholesale Inc.
Rivera v Hacienda MotelRivera v Harborview InnRivera v Highland Texaco
Rivera v Hometown Motors Inc.Rivera v Inns of AmericaRivera v Juan Pollo Chicken
Rivera v KFC (case 751)Rivera v KFC (648)Rivera v Liberty Motors
Rivera v Marina Comfort Suites Rivera v McDonalds (case 425)Rivera v McDonalds (case 977)
Rivera v McDonalds (case 2056)Rivera v MLSL LPRivera v Mobil Oil
Rivera v Mossy ChevroletRivera v Motel 9Rivera v Motel 6
Rivera v Ocean MotorsRivera v Pacific Coast InnRivera v Pacific Inn
Rivera v Palms InnRivera v Ramada InnRivera v Robertitos Mexican Food
Rivera v Santana's Mexican GrillRivera v Security Pacific National BankRivera v Steve's Motor Cars
Rivera v Super AutoRivera v Super 8 MotelRivera v Tacos Mexico (case 545)
Rivera v Tacos Mexico (case 174)Rivera v Tony's MobilRivera v Travelodge
Rivera v Wesoleh Chevrolet    

© 2009 ADAabuse.com  

By your continued viewing or use of this website you thereby agree to the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Copyright Policy. If you do not  agree to those terms and conditions, please leave this site immediately and make no further use of any of the content therein.   01-07-2009


Web Hosting powered by Network Solutions®

What the people suing you may not want you to know . . .